NASA is not certain what occurred to one among its final Apollo moon landers. The reality might be miserable.

missing apollo lunar lander lm 14 lm14 moon landing missions illustration david anderson business insider nasa edit

  • NASA ordered 15 space-grade moon ships for its Apollo program within the 1960s and 1970s.
  • Ten of these automobiles, often known as lunar modules, or LMs, launched into house. Astronauts landed six of them on the moon.
  • After Congress canceled the Apollo program, museums put three spare LMs on show in Florida, New York, and Washington, DC.
  • Grumman Plane (now Northrop Grumman), NASA’s important contractor for the touchdown craft, didn’t end two of them — LM-14 and LM-15.
  • What was left of LM-15 was probably scrapped for metallic. LM-14 most likely met the same destiny, although historians do not have paperwork that’d say for sure.
  • Go to Enterprise Insider’s homepage for extra tales.

In its race to land folks on the moon, the US spent billions on Apollo spaceflight {hardware}. One important piece of drugs created for NASA was a touchdown craft known as the lunar module, or LM.

Grumman Plane (now Northrop Grumman) created LMs, last variations of which weighed about 35,000 kilos and stood roughly two tales tall. As a result of they had been the primary true spaceships — automobiles that operated solely in a vacuum — that they had an alien look.

Paul Fjeld, an area artist and historian of the automobiles, described them as having an “angry” face that “looks like it’s going to dare you to call it ugly.”

“It looks like an unmade bed, and that was by design,” Fjeld advised Enterprise Insider

This was as a result of, regardless of its rough-edged look, the LM design embodied type following perform to maintain astronauts alive.

“It cost an appalling amount of money to make it look that bad,” Fjeld added.

A current unbiased accounting of the Apollo program suggests NASA spent about $2.24 billion on lunar-module design, development, and testing from 1963 by means of 1970. Adjusting for inflation, that is practically $16.66 billion at the moment. Although it is difficult to calculate a person LM’s price, NASA ordered 15 space-worthy ships from Grumman, which works out to about $1.1 billion every in at the moment’s {dollars}.

Not each LM ordered for deep house really made it there, although. When the Apollo program resulted in December 1972, rockets had launched 10 of the moon ships, and 6 of those transported astronauts to and from the lunar floor (on Apollo missions 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17). NASA deserted 4 in house throughout checks.

5 of the 15 modules by no means left planet Earth partially as a result of NASA cancelled Apollo missions 18, 19, and 20. Three of those LMs are straightforward to account for, however the place the final two finally ended up is much less broadly identified or sure.

The uncertainty is very thick surrounding the destiny of LM-14: a spacecraft NASA would have used used on Apollo 20 (had that final mission not been canceled). House museum curators, Northrop Grumman and US authorities archivists, historians, and even NASA itself did not know or could not say with certainty what occurred to LM-14.

A model of the story of this “missing” moon lander that some specialists would agree on, although, is miserable.

What NASA’s moon landers had been and the way three ended up in museums

apollo lunar module lm moon lander rocket engine firing landing illustration drawing concept nasa S69 33765_orig

The lunar module was designed to take two of three Apollo astronauts from a command and repair module in orbit across the moon, land them on the floor, and launch them off the bottom.

Two important sections, or phases, received the job performed. The descent stage got here with an enormous rocket engine, which slowed the car sufficient to drop out of lunar orbit and fall towards the moon’s floor. It additionally powered a delicate touchdown.

The car’s ascent stage — a blocky higher part — blasted the crew off the moon following their floor mission. As soon as again in orbit, the ascent stage linked astronauts again up with the command and repair module. This car then took the 2 moonwalkers and a 3rd astronaut (who’d waited inside through the touchdown) again house to Earth inside a gumdrop-shaped crew capsule.

Learn extra: ‘We might have misplaced the Apollo 11 crew:’ A once-classified anomaly practically killed NASA’s first moon astronauts, a brand new ebook reveals

kennedy space center visitors complex florida Apollo Lunar Module 9 lm9 jud mccranie ccbysa3

Grumman designed, pitched, and constructed the spacecraft as a contractor for NASA and collaborated with the company on plenty of prototypes. However NASA finally ordered 15 space-worthy ships numbered LM-1 by means of LM-15, which earned names like “Eagle” or “Snoopy” solely after reaching orbit and housing crew members.

Three of those 15 LMs ended up in museums on Earth. LM-2 is in Washington, DC; LM-13 is on Lengthy Island in New York; and LM-9 is in Florida.

Why the destiny of NASA’s final 2 moon landers is considerably unclear

nasa apollo lunar module lm drawing illustration diagram labeled parts handbook LM10HandbookVol1 17

Dependable details about LM-14 and LM-15 — the final two space-worthy modules NASA ordered — is tough to search out, and the place official data does exist, it is obscure or conflicting.

On the web site of the Smithsonian Establishment, for instance, which manages most of NASA’s artifacts, LM-15 is marked as “Scrapped,” suggesting its aerospace-grade aluminum was lower up and offered or reused. The identical web page makes a distinction from this, describing LM-14 as “Not Used (mission cancelled).”

In the meantime, a NASA doc titled “Apollo/Skylab ASTP and Shuttle Orbiter Major End Items” — an entire model of which Enterprise Insider obtained from the College of Houston-Clear Lake’s archives — has a unique description. Initially revealed in March 1978, the doc describes itself partially as a “thumbnail historical reference” for NASA’s most prized {hardware}. It lists LM-14 and LM-15 as each “deleted” from the Apollo program, but affords nothing else.

An historian at NASA advised Enterprise Insider he was “not sure about the disposition” of LM-14. A spokesperson for the Smithsonian stated all that is identified about LM-14 is that it was cancelled and a cease work order issued in January 1970.

Josh Stoff, a curator on the Cradle of Aviation Museum, stated he thought a part of LM-14 was integrated right into a mannequin that sits within the yard of the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia.

Nevertheless, Derrick Pitts of the Franklin Institute says no a part of LM-14 is within the science museum’s artifact. 

“It was made clear to us then that what we were receiving was nothing more than a fabrication model,” Pitts advised Enterprise Insider, including that he spoke with Grumman engineers as they rolled the mannequin off a flatbed truck in 1976. “It is not made of any kind of flight-grade material.”

A number of specialists advised us it is no shock that clear and unambiguous documentation of both LM-14 (or LM-15) does not exist — primarily as a result of Grumman did not end the spacecraft. In consequence, neither NASA nor the Smithsonian ever took possession of the automobiles and punctiliously logged their whereabouts.

“We just don’t have any documentary records to speak of,” Mike Neufeld, a senior curator on the Smithsonian Air and House Museum, advised Enterprise Insider.

Nonetheless, house historians are comparatively sure what occurred to the “missing” lunar module, even when they can not definitively show it with paperwork.

NASA’s final moon landers had been most likely Frankensteined into F-14 fighter jets

grumman f 14 f14 tomcat fighter jet US_Navy_051105 F 5480T 005_An_F 14D_Tomcat_conducts_a_mission_over_the_Persian_Gulf region

Robert Pearlman, an area historian who runs the space-history publication CollectSpace, stated he thinks each spacecraft are not with us.

“My understanding is that LM-14 was only partially assembled when the Apollo program ended and ultimately, its parts were scrapped,” he beforehand advised Enterprise Insider.

Neufeld agreed with this, including he is “certain” the spacecraft had been by no means accomplished and that their development was halted at a really early stage.

“LM-15 hardly existed. It hardly had any components built up,” Neufeld stated. “There’s little doubt that LM-14 went away and was junked.”

Fjeld, who’s helped restore the space-grade LMs nonetheless on Earth, whole-heartedly concurred with these assessments.

“I would almost bet the life of my son — I’d bet a lot of money, I’d bet my house — that they just scrapped it,” Fjeld stated of LM-14. “That’s just what they did. Nobody felt any wonderful warm feelings about it. They [the workers] were losing their jobs, they were done with the program.”

lunar module lm 14 15 lm14 lm15 grumman work chart paul fjeld labeled

To again this up, Fjeld despatched Enterprise Insider a Grumman flight historical past chart that he famous is “is extremely accurate based on my research that corroborates many dates.” In response to the chart, Fjeld believes LM-14 was maybe 1% to five% full earlier than employees began reducing it up for scrap.

What’s extra, he says, across the time NASA cancelled work on Apollo, Grumman was constructing brand-new fighter jets for the US army — the F-14 Tomcat — and so it most likely labored  lunar-module metallic into these plane.

“I’m gonna say they would’ve said, ‘Look, we’ve got a bunch of F-14s that are just starting to come off the line here. This is what’s the future for Grumman. We need all the metal that we can get,'” he stated. “‘Can we use that on F-14s?’ ‘Sure.'”

Nonetheless, Fjeld could not promise that some component of LM-14 is not on the market, someplace, in its authentic type.

“I can’t guarantee that some guy didn’t just drive it off the lot and it’s now sitting in his basement or up in an attic that his grandkids have no idea what the hell it is,” he stated. “Who knows?”

Watch a video about our seek for LM-14 beneath:


Have a narrative or data to share? Ship Dave Mosher an e mail at or take into account safer communication choices listed right here.

SEE ALSO: Buzz Aldrin walked on the moon 50 years in the past. Here is what the astronaut remembers most about NASA’s historic Apollo 11 mission.

DON’T MISS: Astronauts clarify why no one has visited the moon in additional than 45 years — and the explanations are miserable

Be part of the dialog about this story »

NASA is not certain what occurred to one among its final Apollo moon landers. The reality might be miserable. NASA is not certain what occurred to one among its final Apollo moon landers. The reality might be miserable.
NASA is not certain what occurred to one among its final Apollo moon landers. The reality might be miserable. NASA is not certain what occurred to one among its final Apollo moon landers. The reality might be miserable.
NASA is not certain what occurred to one among its final Apollo moon landers. The reality might be miserable. NASA is not certain what occurred to one among its final Apollo moon landers. The reality might be miserable.
NASA is not certain what occurred to one among its final Apollo moon landers. The reality might be miserable. NASA is not certain what occurred to one among its final Apollo moon landers. The reality might be miserable.

NASA is not certain what occurred to one among its final Apollo moon landers. The reality might be miserable.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here